Re: NEON- Suck-ins Revisited

To: neon-l@lists.io.com
Subject: Re: NEON- Suck-ins Revisited
From: marcus@ttphysik.uni-duisburg.de (Marcus Thielen)
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:24:12 +0100 (MESZ)
In-Reply-To: <960823045419_74203.3041_GHQ51-1@CompuServe.COM> from "Tom Biebel" at Aug 23, 96 00:54:20 am
Reply-To: neon-l@lists.io.com
Sender: owner-neon-l@IO.COM

> 
>  >> Anyway, I'm really interested in the electron bombardment theory (or is
>  it a known fact?)  Why would electrons emit in such a narrow, focused
>  beam? <<
> 
>  Do you watch television (g.>? Actually, it is not that the beam is so focused.
> The contact point is rather broad but the higher density is toward the middle
> and that is the point where the heat is the most concentrated. Don't forget
> that the outside areas have a cooling effect from conductance but the inside
> of that area will not be able to dissipate the heat and will then melt first.
> With glass it is time and temperature, and to that we can add dispersion.
> 

Dear Tom and John, 

in my opinion the ceramic collar is charged and will work like an 
electrostatic einzell lens to focus the electrons. Possible ? 

Sorry, forgot this in my first mail on this.

Marcus

References:

NEON- Suck-ins Revisited

From: Tom Biebel <74203.3041@compuserve.com>