Re: NEON- Patented Processing System

• To: neon-l@lists.io.com
• Subject: Re: NEON- Patented Processing System
• From: kenny@neonshop.com
• Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:52:06 -5
• Comments: Authenticated sender is <kgreenb@panix.com>
• Priority: normal
• Reply-To: neon-l@lists.io.com
• Sender: owner-neon-l@io.com

I agree with John's sentiments. I'd add what I assume you know, 
that the statistical model or model(s) you choose are extremely 
important.  It looks like you have an interesting procedure.  The 
trick is to make sure that the data you see is really telling you 
what you think it is saying.  

Are you working with a model at this point that tests statistical 
significance?  In crude terms, this filters out the level at which a 
portion of the results you see may be the by-product of chance.

Anyway, I'm very impressed. Good luck.

Kenny




> the potential for ground-breaking research.  I only hope the
> scientific method is adhered to.
> 
>     -John  
> 
Kenny Greenberg --  Neon - Scenic and Environmental Art  
                    Internet Site Consultant and Author   
KRYPTON NEON 34-43 Vernon Blvd Long Island City, NY 11106
         Phone: 718-728-4450  Fax: 718-728-7206  
http://www.neonshop.com  -  The Internet's Neon Shop
http://www.licweb.com  - The Long Island City Web

• Re: NEON- Patented Processing System
• From: marcus@ttphysik.uni-duisburg.de (Marcus Thielen)

• Prev: Re: NEON- Patented Processing System
• Next: Re: NEON- Patented Processing System
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread